1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 242 Or.
  5. 242 Or. 123 (1965)
 

HARTFORD ACC. AND INDEM. v. KAISER

242 Or. 123 (1965)

407 P.2d 899

HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY v. KAISER ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed November 24, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elliot Cummins, McMinnville, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Cummins & Devlin, McMinnville.

Edwin J. Peterson, Portland, argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant. With him on the brief were Tooze, Powers, Kerr, Tooze & Peterson, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, GOODWIN, DENECKE, HOLMAN and SCHWAB, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

GOODWIN, J.

Both parties appeal from a declaration of rights under an insurance policy.

Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company brought declaratory proceedings to absolve itself of any obligation to defend or to satisfy a possible judgment in a pending action by one Denison Grant against Jacob Kaiser, Jr., and his parents. Grant alleged that he was injured by an automobile driven by Jacob Kaiser, Jr.

The Kaisers appeal from a judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases