1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 255 F.Supp.
  5. 255 F.Supp. 67 (1965)
 

CONTINENTAL CAN CO. v. ANCHOR HOCKING GLASS CORP.

Civ. A. No. 64 C 60.

255 F.Supp. 67 (1965)

CONTINENTAL CAN COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff, v. ANCHOR HOCKING GLASS CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. Illinois, E. D.

August 17, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond L. Greist, Fred S. Lockwood, John L. Alex, Greist, Lockwood, Greenawalt & Dewey, Chicago, Ill., William A. Dittmann, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for plaintiff.

James P. Hume, Granger Cook, Jr., Hume, Groen, Clement & Hume, Chicago, Ill., Jack D. Voss, Chicago, Ill., Norman N. Holland, New York City, of counsel, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

JULIUS J. HOFFMAN, District Judge.

The extraordinary standard of living in the United States derives in no small part from the industry and genius of scientists and lawyers, the incentive for invention protected by a sympathetic legal system which at the same time encourages competition where monopoly is not due. We are concerned here with the most minute detail in that standard of living. The validity of two patents is at issue. One...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases