1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 44 N.J.
  5. 44 N.J. 266 (1965)
 

CITY OF CLIFTON v. WEBER

44 N.J. 266 (1965)

208 A.2d 401

CITY OF CLIFTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DONALD P. WEBER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 22, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. David B. Buerger, of the Pennsylvania bar, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. William L. Dill, Jr., and Mr. Bartholomew T. Zanelli, of counsel; Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Dill, attorneys).

Mr. Sam Monchak argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Nicholas G. Mandak, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

The Appellate Division affirmed a conviction for violation of a municipal ordinance, City of Clifton v. Weber, 84 N.J.Super. 333 (1964), and one judge dissenting, the defendant prosecuted this appeal to us. R.R. 1:2-1 (b).

The ordinance regulates house-to-house soliciting or canvassing. Defendant charged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases