1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 240 Or.
  5. 240 Or. 35 (1965)
 

OREGON CITY v. HARTKE

240 Or. 35 (1965)

400 P.2d 255

OREGON CITY v. HARTKE ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed March 10, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George L. Hibbard, Oregon City, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Hibbard, Jacobs, Caldwell & Kincart, Oregon City.

Malcolm J. Montague, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Alden E. Miller, City Attorney, Oregon City, and Williams, Montague, Stark & Thorpe, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and DENECKE, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

O'CONNELL, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment of conviction for the violation of a city zoning ordinance.

Defendants operated a wrecking yard on a parcel of land within Oregon City under an ordinance which permitted the operation as a non-conforming use. Defendants extended their wrecking operation to contiguous land without obtaining municipal authorization to make a non-conforming use of this additional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases