1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 44 N.J.
  5. 44 N.J. 209 (1965)
 

STATE v. NAGLEE

44 N.J. 209 (1965)

207 A.2d 689

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HELEN B. NAGLEE, EDWARD J. GARRITY, AND EDWARD VIRTUE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 1, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. C. Zachary Seltzer argued the cause for defendants (Mr. Angelo D. Malandra, attorney).

Mr. Norman Heine, Prosecutor of Camden County, argued the cause for plaintiff.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.

The defendants, Helen Naglee, Edward J. Garrity, and Edward Virtue, were tried before a jury in Camden County and convicted for conspiracy to obstruct the due administration of the Motor Vehicle Traffic Laws.1 After the trial judge denied their motion for a new trial, they appealed. We certified the matter on our own motion before argument in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases