1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 87 N.J.
  5. 87 N.J. Super. 65 (1965)
 

SAMUEL HIRD & SONS, INC. v. CITY OF GARFIELD

87 N.J. Super. 65 (1965)

208 A.2d 153

SAMUEL HIRD & SONS, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF GARFIELD AND DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. CITY OF GARFIELD IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. AARON LEVINE AND DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 11, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Robert S. Krause argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant Samuel Hird & Sons, Inc. (Mr. S. Eugene Lindstamer, attorney).

Mr. Ralph W. Chandless argued the cause for defendant-respondent and plaintiff-appellant City of Garfield (Messrs. Chandless, Weller & Kramer, attorneys).

No appearance for defendant-respondent Aaron Levine.

Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, filed statement in lieu of brief for respondent Division of Tax Appeals in Docket A-587-63 (Mr. Alan B. Handler, First Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Mr. Elias Abelson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Division of Tax Appeals in Docket A-532-63 (Mr. Arthus J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEWIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.

These are two appeals, argued together, from judgments of the Division of Tax Appeals resulting from a joint hearing of two separate tax appeals concerning assessments of the same property, one for the tax year 1961 (our Docket A-587-63) and the other for the tax year 1962 (our Docket A-532-63).

For the year 1961, as of the assessing date October 1, 1960, the real estate in question was assessed by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases