1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 238 F.Supp.
  5. 238 F.Supp. 880 (1965)
 

MODDERNO v. REYNOLDS

Civ. A. Nos. 329-64, 330-64.

238 F.Supp. 880 (1965)

John P. MODDERNO and Modern-Lab., Incorporated, Plaintiffs, v. Edwin L. REYNOLDS, Acting Commissioner of Patents, Defendant.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

March 11, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald D. Denton, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

Clarence W. Moore, Solicitor, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

JACKSON, District Judge.

These civil actions came on to be heard October 22, 1964. When plaintiffs had completed presentation of their evidence, defendant moved that both actions be dismissed on the ground that the plaintiffs had shown no right to relief. The Court thereupon granted defendant's motion.

Pursuant to Rule 52, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court sets forth its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases