1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 90 N.J.
  5. 90 N.J. Super. 17 (1965)
 

WATKINS v. COWENHOVEN

90 N.J. Super. 17 (1965)

216 A.2d 15

ROZELL WATKINS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. JOHN COWENHOVEN AND MIRIAM COWENHOVEN, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 31, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frederic M. Milstein argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Madnick, Milstein & Mason, attorneys).

Mr. James A. Robottom argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Haskins, Robottom & Hack, attorneys).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, LEWIS and KOLOVSKY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SULLIVAN, S.J.A.D.

This is a workmen's compensation case in which petitioner appeals from a determination by the County Court that an accident in which she was involved did not arise out of or in the course of her employment so that she was not entitled to workmen's compensation benefits for injuries sustained therein. Previously, the Division of Workmen's Compensation had ruled that the accident was work-connected and that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases