1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 240 F.Supp.
  5. 240 F.Supp. 822 (1965)
 

VAN VOORHIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Civ. A. No. 2973-61.

240 F.Supp. 822 (1965)

Mildred L. VAN VOORHIS et al. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

April 19, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Justin Edgerton, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

William F. Patten, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

TAMM, District Judge.

The defendant District of Columbia has moved this Court for judgment in its favor notwithstanding the fact that the jury was unable to reach a verdict. Among the grounds for this motion, the District asserts that:

"The D. C. Employee Non-Liability Act, Section 1-921, et seq., D.C.Code, 1961 Edition, may not be retroactively applied to the facts in this case and, therefore, the action against the District of Columbia is barred for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases