1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 240 F.Supp.
  5. 240 F.Supp. 805 (1965)
 

ARO MANUFACTURING CO. v. CONVERTIBLE TOP REPLACEMENT CO.

Civ. A. No. 62-302.

240 F.Supp. 805 (1965)

ARO MANUFACTURING CO., Inc., and Aro Top Sales Company, Plaintiffs, v. CONVERTIBLE TOP REPLACEMENT COMPANY, General Motors Corporation, and Automobile Body Research Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

March 11, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Wolf, Charles Hieken, Wolf, Greenfield & Hieken, Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs.

Paul V. Power, Gaston, Snow, Motley & Holt, Boston, Mass., for defendant Convertible Top Replacement Co.

Edward B. Hanify, Ropes & Gray, Boston, Mass., for defendant General Motors Corporation.

Stephen A. Moore, Gaston, Snow, Motley & Holt, Boston, Mass., for defendant Automobile Body Research Corporation.

SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

There is before me the motion of the defendant Automobile Body Research Corporation to dismiss the action as against it by reason of insufficiency of process, improper venue, lack of jurisdiction over the person and lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter.

The motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the defendant Corporation will be allowed.

The affidavit of the Treasurer of Automobile Body clearly states that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases