1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 374 Mich.
  5. 374 Mich. 646 (1965)
 

KENT v. BELL

Calendar No. 24, Docket No. 50,470.

374 Mich. 646 (1965)

132 N.W.2d 601

KENT v. BELL.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided February 2, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milton F. Cooney, for plaintiff.

Patterson & Patterson and Barrett (Goodloe H. Rogers, of counsel), for defendant Barrett, executor.

KELLY, J. (dissenting).

For the second time this Court is asked to review the trial court's dismissal of plaintiff's bill of complaint. Plaintiff's original bill of complaint and our reasons why it failed to state a cause of action are fully set forth in Kent v. Bell, 368 Mich. 443.

After remand, with right to amend, plaintiff filed his amended complaint and, in his present brief, outlines the facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases