1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 229 F.Supp.
  5. 229 F.Supp. 674 (1964)
 

OSBORNE v. MASSACHUSETTS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY

Civ. No. 3943.

229 F.Supp. 674 (1964)

J. Carl OSBORNE et al., Plaintiffs, v. MASSACHUSETTS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation, et al., Defendants. MASSACHUSETTS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation et al., Counterclaimants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. J. Carl OSBORNE et al., Counterdefendants and Third-Party Defendants.

United States District Court D. Arizona.

March 17, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph E. McGarry, Lewis, Roca, Scoville, Beauchamp & Linton, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiffs and counterdefendants.

William F. Haug, Jennings, Strouss, Salmon & Trask, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants and counterclaimants.

KILKENNY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs' challenge to the right of Massachusetts Bonding to maintain an action on the indemnity agreements between the parties is premised on the failure of Massachusetts to obtain a license from the Corporation Commission under Article XIV, § 171 of the Constitution of that State, A.R.S. Historically, the regulation of insurance corporations in the State of Arizona has been controlled by the Corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases