1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 226 Cal.App.2d
  5. 226 Cal.App.2d 666 (1964)
 

WILLIAMS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STANISLAUS CTY.

Docket No. 350.

226 Cal.App.2d 666 (1964)

38 Cal. Rptr. 291

JACK MITCHELL WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF STANISLAUS COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

April 27, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marshall W. Krause, J.E. Hahesy, Kronick, Moskovitz & Vanderlaan and Lawrence L. Angelo for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, and Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, for Real Party in Interest.

CONLEY, P.J.

The petition of Jack Mitchell Williams is in form one for a writ of prohibition or other appropriate writ. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, the proceeding will result in the issuance of a writ of mandamus. [1] If a writ of prohibition is uncalled for but the facts warrant positive relief, a writ of mandate may issue (Proctor & Gamble Mfg. Co. v. Superior Court, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases