1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 255 F.Supp.
  5. 255 F.Supp. 618 (1964)
 

SPEE-FLO MANUFACTURING CORPORATION v. GRAY COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 14247.

255 F.Supp. 618 (1964)

The SPEE-FLO MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. GRAY COMPANY, Inc., Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. Texas, Houston Division.

December 31, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richey, McNenny & Farrington, Cleveland, Ohio, H. F. McNenny, Cleveland Ohio, and Hutcheson, Taliaferro & Hutcheson, Houston, Tex., Edward Hutcheson, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff.

Vinson, Elkins, Weems & Searls, Houston, Tex., J. V. Martin, Houston, Tex., and Leonard L. Kalish, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM

CONNALLY, Chief Judge.

In an effort to avoid the finding of direct infringement of Claims 1, 2, 3, and 8 embodied in the memorandum opinion, D.C., 237 F.Supp. 616 (adopted as Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law) of October 14, 1964, defendant on November 3, 1964, filed its "Motion for the Correction and Clarification of Court's Memorandum and Opinion of October 14, 1964." While the case had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases