1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 236 Md.
  5. 236 Md. 626 (1964)
 

OWENS v. STATE

[No. 84, September Term, 1964.]

236 Md. 626 (1964)

204 A.2d 70

OWENS v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided October 23, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George L. Russell, Jr., with whom was Rickard K. Jacobsen on the brief, for appellant.

Robert L. Karwacki, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, William J. O'Donnell and George J. Helinski, State's Attorney and Assistant State's Attorney, respectively, for Baltimore City, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HENDERSON, C.J., and HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY and SYBERT, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

In this narcotics case the appellant argues that it was the duty of the State to produce the informer at the trial. The State furnished to the appellant the name and last known address of the informer. The fact that neither the State nor the accused was able to locate the informer, despite several postponements, does not vitiate the trial. There is no suggestion that the State sought to suppress any information in its possession, or to conceal the whereabouts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases