1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 377 U.S.
  5. 377 U.S. 476 (1964)
 

ARO MFG. CO. v. CONVERTIBLE TOP CO.

No. 75.

377 U.S. 476 (1964)

84 S.Ct. 1526

12 L.Ed.2d 457

ARO MANUFACTURING CO., INC., ET AL. v. CONVERTIBLE TOP REPLACEMENT CO., INC.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 8, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Hicken argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was David Wolf.

Elliott I. Pollock argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

Respondent Convertible Top Replacement Co., Inc., (CTR) acquired by assignment from the Automobile Body Research Corporation (AB) all rights for the territory of Massachusetts in United States Patent No. 2,569,724, known as the Mackie-Duluk patent. This is a combination patent covering a top-structure for automobile "convertibles." Structures embodying the patented combination were included as original equipment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases