1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 236 Md.
  5. 236 Md. 615 (1964)
 

HENN AND JOHNSON v. STATE

[No. 32, September Term, 1964.]

236 Md. 615 (1964)

203 A.2d 899

HENN AND JOHNSON v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided October 15, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas G. Bottom for appellants.

Robert F. Sweeney, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, and Frank H. Newell, III and M. Jacqueline McCurdy, State's Attorney and Assistant State's Attorney, respectively, for Baltimore County, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HENDERSON, C.J., and PRESCOTT, MARBURY, SYBERT and OPPENHEIMER, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

These appellants, convicted of attempted robbery, contend that their confessions were inadmissible, the evidence was insufficient, and counsel was inadequate. We find no merit in any of these contentions. The State met its burden of proving voluntariness, and there was independent proof, through circumstantial evidence, of the corpus delicti. See Veney v. State, 225 Md. 237. We distinguish Escobedo v. Illinois...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases