ROBENSON v. PRESTON


22 Wis.2d 632 (1964)

ROBENSON, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. PRESTON, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Defendants and Appellants: STUPAR, Impleaded Defendant and Respondent. STUPAR, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SAME, Defendants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 3, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Mittelstaed, Heide, Sheldon & Hartley of Kenosha, and oral argument by William A. Sheldon.

For the respondents there was a brief by Phillips & Richards of Kenosha, and oral argument by David L. Phillips.


FAIRCHILD, J.

Appellants attack only the apportionment of negligence and the award of damages for Robenson's injuries.

1. Apportionment of negligence. We view the testimony, where conflicting, in the light most favorable to the support of the verdict. There was evidence that Preston approached the intersection at a speed of 40 to 45 miles per hour, the applicable limit being 25, while Stupar had been driving 20 to 25 miles per hour and slowed to about...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases