REIMANN v. BRENT


238 Or. 415 (1964)

395 P.2d 284

REIMANN ET UX v. BRENT ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed September 10, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles H.S. Howe, Salem, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were McKinney & Churchill, Salem.

Richard D. Barber, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were DeArmond and Sherman, Salem.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, SLOAN, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

GOODWIN, J.

This is a suit to foreclose a land-sale contract. The purchasers appeal from a decree which will foreclose their interest in a house and lot unless, within four months of the date of the decree, the purchasers pay for the property according to the terms of their contract.

The vendor was the builder of the house. After going into possession in August, 1961, the purchasers discovered various defects in the house and lot. As they...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases