1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 376 U.S.
  5. 376 U.S. 240 (1964)
 

PLATT v. MINNESOTA MINING CO.

No. 113.

376 U.S. 240 (1964)

84 S.Ct. 769

11 L.Ed.2d 674

PLATT, CHIEF JUDGE, U. S. DISTRICT COURT, v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 9, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick and Lionel Kestenbaum.

John T. Chadwell argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Glenn W. McGee, Jean Engstrom, Allan J. Reniche and John L. Connolly.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

Rule 21 (b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides that where it appears that an offense was committed in more than one district or division and the court "is satisfied that in the interest of justice the proceeding should be transferred" to another such district or division than the one wherein it is filed, the court shall, upon motion, transfer the case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases