1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 41 N.J.
  5. 41 N.J. 555 (1964)
 

BEADLING v. SIROTTA

41 N.J. 555 (1964)

197 A.2d 857

GEORGE BEADLING, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. E. BERNARD SIROTTA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND SAMUEL M. LANGSTON COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 2, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Sidney P. McCord, Jr. argued the cause for the defendant-appellant, E. Bernard Sirotta (Messrs. McCord, Farrell & Eynon, attorneys).

Mr. Charles A. McGeary argued the cause for the defendant-appellant, Samuel M. Langston Company (Messrs. Bleakly, Stockwell & Zink, attorneys)

Mr. Martin L. Haines argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Dimon, Haines & Bunting, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.

The plaintiff, George Beadling, seeks damages from Dr. E. Bernard Sirotta, a radiologist, for injuries and losses sustained as the result of an allegedly negligent diagnosis and report made by the doctor respecting the health of the plaintiff. He also seeks damages from Samuel M. Langston Company on the theory of respondeat superior, contending that Dr. Sirotta was the agent of Langston in making the diagnosis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases