1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 237 Or.
  5. 237 Or. 356 (1964)
 

ALEXANDER v. PILLSBURY CO.

237 Or. 356 (1964)

391 P.2d 644

ALEXANDER v. PILLSBURY COMPANY and TASSOCK

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed April 22, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond J. Conboy, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were James L. Hannam and Hollister & Thomas, Portland.

Clifford N. Carlsen, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were King, Miller, Anderson, Nash & Yerke, and Jean P. Lowman, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, SLOAN and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

This was an action for injury sustained by plaintiff in an automobile accident. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff against defendant Tassock but exonerated defendant Pillsbury Company. Defendant Tassock appeals.

The accident happened on Sandy Boulevard in Portland at 11:15 p.m. on April 7, 1962, when plaintiff was riding in a car driven by her husband in an easterly direction on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases