1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 230 F.Supp.
  5. 230 F.Supp. 337 (1964)
 

ARMSTRONG v. MOTOROLA, INC.

No. 54 C 19.

230 F.Supp. 337 (1964)

Esther Marion ARMSTRONG, Executrix, Plaintiff, v. MOTOROLA, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. Illinois, E. D.

May 14, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dana M. Raymond, Brumbaugh, Free, Graves & Donohue, New York City, George N. Hibben, Davis, Lindsey, Hibben & Noyes, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Mueller & Aichele, Foorman L. Mueller, George Aichele, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for defendant.

ROBSON, District Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

I. NATURE OF ACTION AND PLEADINGS

1. This is an action under the patent laws of the United States for infringement of the following three patents:

a. Patent No. 1,941,066 (hereinafter called the '066 patent), issued December 26, 1933, to Edwin H. Armstrong on an application filed July 30, 1930. Plaintiff relies on claims 8, 9 and 10. b. Patent No. 1,941,069 (hereinafter called the '069...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases