1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 236 F.Supp.
  5. 236 F.Supp. 322 (1964)
 

ASBURY TRANSPORTATION CO. v. UNITED STATES

Civ. No. 64-1452-S.

236 F.Supp. 322 (1964)

ASBURY TRANSPORTATION CO., a corporation, and Cantley & Tanzola, Inc., a corporation, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

November 23, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Russell & Schureman, by Theodore Russell, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff Cantlay & Tanzola, Inc.

Knapp, Gill, Hibbert & Stevens, by Warren Grossman, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff Asbury Transp. Co.

Thomas R. Sheridan, U. S. Atty., and Wm. B. Spivak, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., for defendants.

Max Eddy Utt, Charles H. Phillips and Arthur Glanz, Los Angeles, for Allyn Transp. Co., intervenor.

Before BARNES, Circuit Judge, and THURMOND CLARKE and ALBERT LEE STEPHENS, Jr., District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On October 21, 1964, plaintiffs filed their complaint to suspend, enjoin, annul and set aside order of The Interstate Commerce Commission pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336, 1398, 2284 and 2321-2325, 49 U.S.C. §§ 17(9), 305(g) and 5 U.S.C. § 1009. This case is a proper one to be heard and determined by a District Court of three Judges convened pursuant to the provisions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases