1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 229 F.Supp.
  5. 229 F.Supp. 275 (1964)
 

BEST ADVERTISING CORP. v. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.

Civ. A. No. RI-61.

229 F.Supp. 275 (1964)

BEST ADVERTISING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, and the Reuben H. Donnelley Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. Illinois, N. D.

April 23, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Denger, Rock Island, Ill., for plaintiff.

Sidley, Austin, Burgess & Smith, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

MERCER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, Best Advertising Corp., filed this complaint pursuant to the provisions of Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15, for treble the amount of damages allegedly sustained by plaintiff as a result of defendants' alleged violation of Section 1 and 2 of Sherman Antitrust Act. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2. The defendants, Illinois Bell Telephone Company and The Reuben H. Donnelley Corporation, filed their motion to dismiss the complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases