1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 336 F.2d
  5. 336 F.2d 151 (1964)
 

GOOSMAN v. A. DUIE PYLE, INC.

No. 9327.

336 F.2d 151 (1964)

Frederick Z. GOOSMAN, to his own use and to the use of Royal Indemnity Company, a body corporate, Appellant, v. A. DUIE PYLE, INC., a body corporate, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Decided September 3, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Melvin J. Sykes and Paul Berman, Baltimore, Md. (Paul M. Higinbothom, Baltimore, Md., and Rose Rothenberg, New York City, on brief), for appellant.

John F. King, Baltimore, Md. (Frank J. Vecella and Anderson, Coe & King, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellee.

Before BRYAN and BELL, Circuit Judges, and MICHIE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

In this automobile collision case on the first appeal we questioned only the trial court's refusal to order production of certain accident reports made by the defendant-appellee's driver. Goosman v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc., 320 F.2d 45, 53 (4 Cir.1963). The ruling was innocuous if, as Judge Boreman patly put it in the opinion, "the reports are factually consistent with the [driver's] testimony at the trial, and in deposition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases