1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 233 F.Supp.
  5. 233 F.Supp. 250 (1964)
 

KILLEBREW v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RY. CO.

Civ. No. 64-280.

233 F.Supp. 250 (1964)

Reba KILLEBREW, Plaintiff, v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RY. CO., and John Crownover, Defendants.

United States District Court W. D. Oklahoma.

September 17, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cargill, Cargill, Chiaf, Rudkin & Cargill, Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiff.

Franklin, Harmon & Satterfield, Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendants.

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on both a motion to remand filed by the plaintiff and a motion to dismiss filed in behalf of the defendant Crownover. The motion to dismiss is related to the motion to remand. If the motion to dismiss is well taken there is diversity and this Court will retain jurisdiction; if not well taken the requisite jurisdictional diversity is not present and the cause must be remanded.

The determinative question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases