1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 245 F.Supp.
  5. 245 F.Supp. 218 (1964)
 

AMF TUBOSCOPE, INC. v. ARROW PIPE SERVICE, INC.

Civ. A. No. 9892.

245 F.Supp. 218 (1964)

AMF TUBOSCOPE, INC., and American Machine & Foundry Co., Plaintiffs, v. ARROW PIPE SERVICE, INC., and Joe H. Cunningham, Jr., Defendants.

United States District Court W. D. Oklahoma, Oklahoma City Division.

March 10, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred P. Murrah, Jr., Rainey, Flynn & Welch, Oklahoma City, Okl., Paul E. Harris, Bryan Medlock and Tom Arnold, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs, AMF Tuboscope, Inc. and American Machine & Foundry Co.

Jerry J. Dunlap, Dunlap, Laney & Hubbard, Oklahoma City, Okl., W. Samuel Dykeman, Lybrand & Morgan, Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendants, Arrow Pipe Service, Inc. and Joe H. Cunningham, Jr.

CHANDLER, Chief Judge.

The above entitled cause came on regularly for trial and the Court having duly considered the evidence and being fully advised in the premises now finds the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1.

Plaintiff, American Machine and Foundry Co., is a New Jersey corporation having its principal place of business in New York, New York.

2.

Plaintiff, AMF Tuboscope, Inc., is a Texas corporation having its principal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases