1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 238 F.Supp.
  5. 238 F.Supp. 191 (1964)
 

BENRUS WATCH COMPANY v. UNITED STATES

No. 2469.

238 F.Supp. 191 (1964)

BENRUS WATCH COMPANY, Inc., et al. v. UNITED STATES.

United States Customs Court, Second Division.

June 30, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Covington & Burling, Washington, D. C. (Stanley L. Temko and Mark A. Weiss, Washington, D. C., of counsel); Lane, Young & Fox, New York City (William H. Fox, New York City, of counsel), associate counsel; for plaintiffs.

Andrew P. Vance, Chief, Customs Section, Washington, D. C. (Sheila N. Ziff and Herbert L. Warren, New York City, trial attorneys), for defendant.

Before LAWRENCE, RAO, and FORD, Judges.

LAWRENCE, Judge.

This cause of action presents for our determination the question whether the collector of customs properly withheld delivery to the plaintiffs of certain watch movements, imported from Switzerland, on the ground that they were not accurately marked, as required by applicable provisions of the statute quoted, infra.

The jurisdiction of the court was invoked by the protests specified below, duly filed pursuant to section 514 of the Tariff Act...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases