1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 379 U.S.
  5. 379 U.S. 29 (1964)
 

BRULOTTE v. THYS CO.

No. 20.

379 U.S. 29 (1964)

85 S.Ct. 176

13 L.Ed.2d 99

BRULOTTE ET AL. v. THYS CO.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 16, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward S. Irons argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Charles C. Countryman.

Elwood Hutcheson argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George W. Wilkins.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick and Robert B. Hummel filed a brief for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.

Rufus S. Day, Jr., Robert W. Fulwider and Robert J. Woolsey filed a brief for Well Surveys, Inc., as amicus curiae, urging affirmance.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

Respondent, owner of various patents for hop-picking, sold a machine to each of the petitioners for a flat sum1 and issued a license for its use. Under that license there is payable a minimum royalty of $500 for each hop-picking season or $3.33 1/3 per 200 pounds of dried hops harvested by the machine, whichever is greater. The licenses by their terms may not be assigned nor may the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases