1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 228 F.Supp.
  5. 228 F.Supp. 165 (1964)
 

HEINTZ & CO. v. PROVIDENT TRADESMENS BANK AND TRUST CO.

Civ. A. No. 29951.

228 F.Supp. 165 (1964)

HEINTZ & CO., Inc., Plaintiff, v. PROVIDENT TRADESMENS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Donald M. KERR, Donald M. Kerr, Inc. and Suburban Marketers, Inc., Third-Party Defendants and Counterclaimants.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

March 30, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis E. Shields, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Swartz, Campbell & Henry, Joseph Head, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

KRAFT, District Judge.

Heintz & Co., Inc. (Heintz), a California corporation, having its principal office in that state, brought this action in the Court of Common Pleas No. 3 of Philadelphia County against Provident Tradesmens Bank and Trust Company (Provident), a Pennsylvania corporation, with its principal office in Philadelphia. Claiming a right to remove under 28 U.S.C. § 1441, because of the existence of diversity of citizenship and of a controversy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases