1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 85 N.J.
  5. 85 N.J. Super. 297 (1964)
 

D'AMICO v. BLANCK

85 N.J. Super. 297 (1964)

204 A.2d 609

HARRY R. D'AMICO AND CATHERINE D'AMICO, TRADING AS D'AMICO LIQUOR STORE, APPELLANTS, v. HORACE W. BLANCK, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 2, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Norman Heine argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Samuel P. Orlando, attorney).

Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr. argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Richman, Berry & Ferren, attorneys).

Mr. Samuel B. Helfand, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, SULLIVAN and LABRECQUE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

This is an appeal from an order of the Acting Director of the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control concurring in and adopting the report and conclusions of the Division hearer and ordering that the action of respondent council of the Borough of Magnolia in granting a plenary retail distribution license and renewals thereof to appellants D'Amico under an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases