1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 235 F.Supp.
  5. 235 F.Supp. 111 (1964)
 

ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA v. TANDET

Civ. No. 9534.

235 F.Supp. 111 (1964)

ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. William H. TANDET, Defendant.

United States District Court D. Connecticut.

As Revised November 25, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Barton, Pullman, Comley, Bradley & Reeves, Bridgeport, Conn., for plaintiff.

Julius B. Kuriansky, Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & Kuriansky, Stamford, Conn., for defendant.

ZAMPANO, District Judge.

Plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as Alcoa, moves the Court for a judgment on the pleadings dismissing defendant Tandet's Second Affirmative Defense and Counterclaim based on Section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13. Plaintiff claims the pleadings do not state a violation of the Act since Tandet was not a purchaser from Alcoa and no sale at a discriminatory price is alleged.

Alcoa...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases