HUBBARD v. PAPE

No. 9081.

2 Ohio App. 2d 326 (1964)

HUBBARD ET AL., APPELLEES, v. PAPE ET AL., APPELLANTS ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County.

Decided February 17, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jerome Goldman and Messrs. Magrish & Magrish, for appellees.

Mr. Milton M. Bloom, for appellants.


DOYLE, J.

The issues presented in this trial de novo have been carefully examined and re-examined in the light of the pleadings and the evidence.

1. This court finds, as did the Common Pleas Court, that the petitioners and the defendants Pape, Carroll and Luegering, and one Paul Ashcraft, as the original stockholders and employees of the Lackner Custom Sign Service Company, agreed that no one of the stockholders could sell or dispose of his stock without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases