1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 43 N.J.
  5. 43 N.J. 279 (1964)
 

JONES v. BAYONNE BARREL & DRUM CO.

43 N.J. 279 (1964)

204 A.2d 4

STAFFORD JONES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BAYONNE BARREL & DRUM CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 19, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Clive S. Cummis argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Harvey A. Lieb, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

This is a workmen's compensation case which came to us as of right because of a dissent in the Appellate Division. R.R. 1:2-1(b). The Division of Workmen's Compensation, the county court, and the majority of the Appellate Division found for petitioner, albeit their factual theses were not concordant. We are not persuaded to disturb the judgment. It is accordingly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases