1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 230 F.Supp.
  5. 230 F.Supp. 85 (1964)
 

UNITED STATES v. MAYO

230 F.Supp. 85 (1964)

UNITED STATES of America, v. Louis MAYO et al., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

May 27, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, New York City, for United States of America, Peter Emmet Fleming, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel.

Bernard Jay Coven, New York City, for defendant, Louis Mayo.

WEINFELD, District Judge.

MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND COUNT

The second count of the indictment is entirely adequate and meets the required standard. The defendant is advised of the nature of the charges in sufficient detail to enable adequate preparation of his defense and to plead a judgment in bar of any further prosecution for the same offense.1 The claim that the second count is fatally defective because the charging paragraph...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases