1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 234 F.Supp.
  5. 234 F.Supp. 59 (1964)
 

LENNERTH v. MENDENHALL

Civ. A. No. C 64-220.

234 F.Supp. 59 (1964)

Edward C. LENNERTH et al., Plaintiffs, v. Samuel T. MENDENHALL et al., Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

August 5, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Myron T. Krotinger, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Avery Cohen, Cleveland, Ohio, and F. J. Wettrick, Seattle, Wash., for defendants.

CONNELL, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs instituted the within action charging the several defendants with fraud and deceit in the sale of securities, and seeking rescission of the sale. Thereafter they caused most of the named defendants to be served with process according to law. The complaint specifically states that the action arises under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.A. § 78(j)). After filing the complaint, during the investigation of the case by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases