1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 23 Wis.2d
  5. 23 Wis.2d 1 (1964)
 

TATE v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

23 Wis.2d 1 (1964)

TATE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Defendant and Appellant: BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 3, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant Industrial Commission there was a brief by Arnold J. Spencer, chief counsel of the unemployment compensation division, and Max J. Peltin, and oral argument by Mr. Spencer.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Harvey L. McCormick of Milwaukee.

FAIRCHILD, J.

1. Support for finding of voluntary termination. If an employee absents himself from work, but does not intend to terminate the employment relationship, his failure to notify his employer of the reason and probable duration of his absence, might, under some circumstances, constitute misconduct connected with his employment so that if the employer discharges him therefor, the employee would be ineligible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases