McAVOY v. DI LEO


43 Misc.2d 164 (1964)

Harold V. McAvoy et al., Respondents, v. Anna Di Leo et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) City of New Rochelle, Plaintiff, v. Frank Di Leo, Defendant. (Action No. 2.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

April 22, 1964


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard H. Schrecke for appellants. Fasso & Belserene (Thomas N. Fasso of counsel), for respondents.

Concur — BENJAMIN, GULOTTA and McDONALD, JJ.


Per Curiam.

Section 205-a of the General Municipal Law is not available to the plaintiffs in the situation here disclosed.

The order denying defendants' motion to dismiss the second cause of action in each complaint should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion granted.

Order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases