1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 229 F.Supp.
  5. 229 F.Supp. 1009 (1964)
 

HORNSTEIN v. ATCHINSON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILROAD

Civ. No. 3627.

229 F.Supp. 1009 (1964)

Maurice HORNSTEIN and Amalia Hornstein, Plaintiffs, v. ATCHINSON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILROAD, a foreign corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court W. D. Wisconsin.

June 3, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas Nelson, Madison, Wis., for plaintiffs.

William J. P. Aberg, Aberg, Bell, Blake & Metzner, Madison, Wis., for defendant.

RABINOVITZ, Judge.

The matter before the Court is a motion to quash the return of the summons for the reason that the defendant is not amenable to process in Wisconsin because it is not doing business in this State, and for the further reason that service of the summons on defendant's agent, G. F. Mueller, was insufficient.

This is a personal injury action. The injury allegedly occurred while the plaintiffs were riding as paying passengers on defendant's railroad...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases