1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 230 F.Supp.
  5. 230 F.Supp. 838 (1964)
 

MONTGOMERY ENGINEERING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES

Civ. A. No. 283-62.

230 F.Supp. 838 (1964)

MONTGOMERY ENGINEERING COMPANY, William Hecht and May Belle Hecht, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

June 17, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lowenstein & Spicer, Newark, by Murry D. Brochin, Newark, N. J., for plaintiffs.

David M. Satz, Jr., U. S. Atty., by Martin Holleran, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Solomon Fisher, D. C. Bar, for the United States.

WORTENDYKE, District Judge:

This case was tried to the Court without a jury. Jurisdiction in this Court derives from 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) (1).

Plaintiff, Montgomery Engineering Company, a New Jersey corporation (hereinafter the Company) with its place of business in Jersey City, seeks a refund of alleged overpayments of Federal Income Taxes for the calendar years 1957, 1958 and 1959, for assessed deficiencies based upon disallowance, as non-deductible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases