1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 227 F.Supp.
  5. 227 F.Supp. 829 (1964)
 

CANADIAN INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY v. D. LOVEMAN & SONS, INC.

Civ. No. C 63-572.

227 F.Supp. 829 (1964)

CANADIAN INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, Limited, Plaintiff, v. D. LOVEMAN & SONS, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

March 20, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. Poore and Patrick F. McCartan (of Jones, Day, Cockley & Reavis), Cleveland, Ohio, and Harold F. McGuire (of Wickes, Riddell, Bloomer, Jacobi & McGuire), New York City, for plaintiff.

Jerome N. Curtis, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.

CONNELL, Chief Judge.

The first count of the complaint alleges a diversity claim by which the plaintiff charges the defendants with conspiring to defraud the plaintiff by bribing the plaintiff's chief buyer. After the alleged conspiracy supposedly became a successful fact, the defendants are charged with engineering an elaborate scheme to conceal their conspiracy. It is specifically averred that the defendants paid the buyer at least $21,000 in cash and

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases