1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 413 Pa.
  5. 413 Pa. 587 (1964)
 

HOFFMAN v. RITTENHOUSE

413 Pa. 587 (1964)

Hoffman, Appellant, v. Rittenhouse.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 17, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard Gittis, with him James P. Coho, Herbert W. Yanowitz, Thomas D. McBride, and Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, for appellant.

W. Hensel Brown, with him Brown & Zimmerman, for appellees.

Before MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE O'BRIEN, March 17, 1964:

Plaintiff-appellant, Sol Hoffman, trading and doing business as Tri-State Music Company, appeals from a final decree in equity, dismissing his complaint, which sought to enforce a restrictive covenant against appellees, Harold Rittenhouse and his present employer, Independent Music Company. Harold Rittenhouse had been employed by Albert Rosman, doing business as Penn State Music...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases