1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 215 F.Supp.
  5. 215 F.Supp. 700 (1963)
 

UNITED STATES v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY

No. 62-C-707.

215 F.Supp. 700 (1963)

UNITED STATES of America, For the Use and Benefit of VICTORY ELECTRIC CORP., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

April 2, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seymour Goldstein, Brooklyn, for plaintiffs.

Nevius, Jarvis & Pilz, New York City, for defendant; Emil V. Pilz, J. Edward Davey, Jr., New York City, of counsel.

BARTELS, District Judge.

Having heretofore denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and judgment on the pleadings the Court granted the defendant leave for reargument.

Aside from relative minor claims,1 the essence of the defendant's argument is that the Court erred in two respects, in (1) holding that it had jurisdiction under Section 1352, 28 U.S.C.A., to entertain the action, and in (2) holding that the plaintiffs had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases