1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 220 F.Supp.
  5. 220 F.Supp. 576 (1963)
 

LOEWENGART & CO. v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 2405; Protest No. 60/21284.

220 F.Supp. 576 (1963)

LOEWENGART & CO. v. UNITED STATES.

United States Customs Court, First Division.

June 24, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Siegel, Mandell & Davidson, New York City (Joshua M. Davidson and David Serko, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Alfred A. Taylor, Jr., and Mollie Strum, trial attys., New York City), for defendant.

Sharretts, Paley & Carter, New York City (Eugene F. Blauvelt, New York City, of counsel), as amicus curiae.

Before OLIVER, Chief Judge, and WILSON, Judge.

WILSON, Judge.

The merchandise in this case consists of a quantity of India-tanned goatskins, which had been subjected to a tanning process in India before exportation. The imported skins were classified under the provisions of paragraph 1530(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as "vegetable-tanned rough leather made from goat or sheep skins (including those commercially known as India-tanned goat or sheep skins)" and assessed with duty at 10 per centum ad valorem. The plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases