1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 410 Pa.
  5. 410 Pa. 356 (1963)
 

BLANCHARD v. WILT

410 Pa. 356 (1963)

Blanchard v. Wilt, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 19, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James W. Mack, Jr., for appellants.

Alexander A. Notopoulos, with him Martin Goodman, W. Parker Ruddock, and Goodman & Notopoulos, for appellees.

Before BELL, C.J., MUSMANNO, COHEN, EAGEN and O'BRIEN, JJ.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE EAGEN, March 19, 1963:

The plaintiffs, Raymond T. Blanchard and Betty Lou Blanchard, retained the defendants, B.O. Wilt and Eugene T. Wilt, trading as B.O. Wilt and Son (Wilt), a partnership engaged in the general contracting business, to remodel their home. Wilt hired Clyde Nehrig to perform the plumbing work as an independent subcontractor. During the course of the work, the house was extensively damaged by fire, allegedly caused by the negligence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases