ROSEFIELD v. ROSEFIELD

Docket No. 20750.

221 Cal.App.2d 431 (1963)

34 Cal. Rptr. 479

KELLY ROSEFIELD, a Minor, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. MARVIN ROSEFIELD, et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

October 22, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ericksen, Ericksen & Kincaid and Richard D. Bridgman for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Weinmann, Rode, Burnhill & Moffitt and Ralph N. Mendelson for Defendants and Respondents.


DEVINE, J.

General demurrer, on the ground that no cause of action was stated, was sustained with leave to amend, but plaintiffs declined to amend. Judgment for defendant Marvin Rosefield was entered, and plaintiffs appeal. [1a] The complaint, by Kelly Rosefield, a minor, by her guardian ad litem and by Manon Rosefield, her mother, is directed against Marvin Rosefield, the child's grandfather who is the mother's father-in-law, and also against Robin Rosefield...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases