1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 233 Or.
  5. 233 Or. 392 (1963)
 

ROBINSON ET UX v. MANNING ET AL

233 Or. 392 (1963)

378 P.2d 277

ROBINSON ET UX v. MANNING ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed and remanded January 30, 1963.

Petition for rehearing denied February 19, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald K. Ragen, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Black, Kendall, Tremaine, Boothe & Higgins and Ferris F. Boothe, Portland.

Clarence A. Potts, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Potts & Davidson and Harold L. Davidson, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, SLOAN, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants, Olive Robinson Manning, Tom Manning, Everett T. Robinson, and Ann Robinson, from a decree which the circuit court entered in favor of the plaintiffs Thomas Arthur Robinson and Lura M. Robinson, husband and wife. Thomas Arthur Robinson is the father of the defendants-appellants Olive Robinson Manning and Everett T. Robinson. The defendant-appellant Tom Manning is the husband of Olive Robinson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases