SYMCOX v. ZUK

Docket No. 26931.

221 Cal.App.2d 383 (1963)

34 Cal. Rptr. 462

C.E. SYMCOX, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALBERT ZUK et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

October 21, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin M. Rosenberg, Guy Richard Crump, Lewis, Singer, Burns & Goldstone, A.A. Goldstone, Trippet, Yoakum & Ballentyne, Oscar A. Trippet and Neil Papiano for Defendants and Appellants.

Nossaman, Thompson, Waters & Moss, Laughlin E. Waters and Rodney C. Hill for Plaintiff and Respondent.


KINGSLEY, J.

The record in this case is voluminous and there is substantial conflict as to many of the facts. However, as is our duty on an appeal, we limit our statement to the facts found by the trial court and sustained by the evidence, and to the version most favorable to respondent.1

A company known as "Nips, Inc.," located in New York, originated the concept of bottling and merchandising perfumes in small plastic vials, each...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases