1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 212 F.Supp.
  5. 212 F.Supp. 360 (1963)
 

SARGENT LINE CORPORATION v. TUG POTTSVILLE

212 F.Supp. 360 (1963)

SARGENT LINE CORPORATION, Libellant, v. TUG POTTSVILLE, Reading Company, Claimant, and TUG WILMA S., Peerless Oil & Chemical Corporation, Claimant. M.T.C. CORPORATION, Libellant, v. TUG POTTSVILLE, Reading Company, Claimant, and Tug Wilma S., Martin T. Carey, Claimant-Impleaded.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

January 3, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mahar & Mason, New York City, Frank C. Mason, New York City, of counsel, for Sargent Line Corp.

Anthony B. Cataldo, New York City, for M. T. C. Corp. and Tug Wilma S. and her claimant.

Macklin, Speer, Hanan & McKernan, New York City, John C. Hart, Gerald J. McKernan, New York City, of counsel, for Reading Co.

DAWSON, District Judge.

This trial involves the consolidation of two admiralty actions both of which concern the same collision. The barge WILLIAM C. DOWNING, while in tow of the tug POTTSVILLE, collided with the barge MARY T. CAREY, while in tow of the tug WILMA S. The collision occurred at about 8:45 P.M. on the evening of July 11, 1961 in the East River, approximately 250 feet off the India Street dock on the Brooklyn shore.

One action is by Sargent Line...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases